Skip Navigation

The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 2005 10(2):184-192; doi:10.1093/deafed/eni018
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hintermair, M.
Right arrow Articles by Albertini, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hintermair, M.
Right arrow Articles by Albertini, J. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

Ethics, Deafness, and New Medical Technologies

Manfred Hintermair

University of Education, Heidelberg

John A. Albertini

National Technical Institute for the Deaf, Rochester Institute of Technology

In the last 50 years, several new technologies have become enormously important within the Deaf community and have helped significantly to improve deaf people's lives in a hearing world. Current public attention and admiration, however, seems unduly focused on medical technologies that promise to solve "the problem" of being deaf. One reason for this interest, we argue, is the public's preoccupation with deafness as a disability and promises that technological breakthroughs such as the cochlear implant will "cure" deafness. Pressure on parents to make quick and early decisions and lack of adequate information about alternatives often leave them unprepared for the consequences of these decisions. To allow deaf individuals and their families to make better informed decisions about their lives and their futures, we argue finally that professionals who interact with these families adopt inclusive and individualizing ethics.

Correspondence should be sent to John A. Albertini, Department of Research, National Technical Institute for the Deaf, Rochester Institute of Technology, 96 Lomb Memorial Drive, Rochester, NY 14623-5604 (e-mail: jaancr{at}rit.edu).

Received June 28, 2004; revised December 1, 2004; accepted December 4, 2004


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Communication Disorders QuarterlyHome page
S. R. Easterbrooks
Knowledge and Skills for Teachers of Individuals Who Are Deaf and Hard of Hearing: Advanced Set Development
Communication Disorders Quarterly, November 1, 2008; 30(1): 37 - 48.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Deaf Stud Deaf EducHome page
M. Hyde and D. Power
Some Ethical Dimensions of Cochlear Implantation for Deaf Children and Their Families
J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ., January 1, 2006; 11(1): 102 - 111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.