Skip Navigation


Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education Advance Access originally published online on May 18, 2005
The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 2005 10(3):244-255; doi:10.1093/deafed/eni026
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
10/3/244    most recent
eni026v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Antia, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Kreimeyer, K. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Antia, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Kreimeyer, K. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

Empirical Articles

Written Language of Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Students in Public Schools

Shirin D. Antia and Susanne Reed

University of Arizona

Kathryn H. Kreimeyer

Arizona State Schools for Deaf and Blind

We obtained data on the writing of 110 deaf or hard-of-hearing students attending public schools who completed the spontaneous writing portion of the Test of Written Language. The average written quotient for the sample was in the below-average range but within 1 standard deviation of the test mean. Forty-nine percent of the sample received written quotients within or above the average range. Mean scores for the three subtests of contextual conventions, contextual language, and story construction were within the low-average range; between 55% and 68% of students scored within the average or above-average range for the subtests. Predictors of writing quotients were eligibility for free lunch, grade, degree of hearing loss and gender; however, only 18% of the variance in total writing quotients was explained by these variables. The data indicate that attention needs to be paid to the writing ability and instruction of many public-school students regardless of degree of hearing loss.

Correspondence should be sent to Shirin Antia, University of Arizona, College of Education, Department of Special Education and Rehabilitation, P.O. Box 210069, Tucson, AZ 85721–0069 (e-mail: santia{at}u.arizona.edu).

Received April 26, 2004; revised December 7, 2004; accepted December 15, 2004


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Deaf Stud Deaf EducHome page
K. A. Wolbers
Using Balanced and Interactive Writing Instruction to Improve the Higher Order and Lower Order Writing Skills of Deaf Students
J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ., April 1, 2008; 13(2): 257 - 277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Deaf Stud Deaf EducHome page
B. Schick, K. Williams, and H. Kupermintz
Look Who's Being Left Behind: Educational Interpreters and Access to Education for Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Students
J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ., January 1, 2006; 11(1): 3 - 20.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.