Skip Navigation


Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education Advance Access originally published online on June 4, 2007
The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 2007 12(4):432-448; doi:10.1093/deafed/enm022
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
12/4/432    most recent
enm022v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blatto-Vallee, G.
Right arrow Articles by Fonzi, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Blatto-Vallee, G.
Right arrow Articles by Fonzi, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Visual–Spatial Representation in Mathematical Problem Solving by Deaf and Hearing Students

Gary Blatto-Vallee and Ronald R. Kelly

National Technical Institute for the Deaf, Rochester Institute of Technology

Martha G. Gaustad

Bowling Green State University

Jeffrey Porter

National Technical Institute for the Deaf, Rochester Institute of Technology

Judith Fonzi

University of Rochester


   Abstract

This research examined the use of visual–spatial representation by deaf and hearing students while solving mathematical problems. The connection between spatial skills and success in mathematics performance has long been established in the literature. This study examined the distinction between visual–spatial "schematic" representations that encode the spatial relations described in a problem versus visual–spatial "pictorial" representations that encode only the visual appearance of the objects described in a problem. A total of 305 hearing (n = 156) and deaf (n = 149) participants from middle school, high school, and college participated in this study. At all educational levels, the hearing students performed significantly better in solving the mathematical problems compared to their deaf peers. Although the deaf baccalaureate students exhibited the highest performance of all the deaf participants, they only performed as well as the hearing middle school students who were the lowest scoring hearing group. Deaf students remained flat in their performance on the mathematical problem-solving task from middle school through the college associate degree level. The analysis of the students’ problem representations showed that the hearing participants utilized visual–spatial schematic representation to a greater extent than did the deaf participants. However, the use of visual–spatial schematic representations was a stronger positive predictor of mathematical problem-solving performance for the deaf students. When deaf students’ problem representation focused simply on the visual–spatial pictorial or iconic aspects of the mathematical problems, there was a negative predictive relationship with their problem-solving performance. On two measures of visual–spatial abilities, the hearing students in high school and college performed significantly better than their deaf peers.

Correspondence should be sent to Gary Blatto-Vallee, Department of Science and Mathematics, National Technical Institute for the Deaf, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, New York 14623-5604 (e-mail: gcvntm{at}rit.edu).

Received October 21, 2006; revised April 3, 2007; accepted April 6, 2007


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.