Skip Navigation


Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education Advance Access originally published online on May 3, 2008
The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 2008 13(4):546-561; doi:10.1093/deafed/enn014
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
13/4/546    most recent
enn014v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marschark, M.
Right arrow Articles by Pelz, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marschark, M.
Right arrow Articles by Pelz, J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Learning via Direct and Mediated Instruction by Deaf Students

Marc Marschark

National Technical Institute for the Deaf—Rochester Institute of Technology, University of Edinburgh, University of Aberdeen

Patricia Sapere

Carol Convertino

National Technical Institute for the Deaf—Rochester Institute of Technology

Jeff Pelz

Rochester Institute of Technology


  Abstract

Four experiments investigated classroom learning by deaf college students receiving lectures from instructors signing for themselves or using interpreters. Deaf students’ prior content knowledge, scores on postlecture assessments of content learning, and gain scores were compared to those of hearing classmates. Consistent with prior research, deaf students, on average, came into and left the classroom with less content knowledge than hearing peers, and use of simultaneous communication (sign and speech together) and American Sign Language (ASL) apparently were equally effective for deaf students’ learning of the material. Students’ self-rated sign language skills were not significantly related to performance. Two new findings were of particular importance. First, direct and mediated instruction (via interpreting) were equally effective for deaf college students under the several conditions employed here. Second, despite coming into the classroom with the disadvantage of having less content knowledge, deaf students’ gain scores generally did not differ from those of their hearing peers. Possible explanations for these findings are considered.

Correspondence should be sent to Marc Marschark, Center for Education Research Partnerships, National Technical Institute for the Deaf—Rochester Institute of Technology, 52 Lomb Memorial Drive, Rochester, NY 14623 (e-mail: marc.marschark{at}rit.edu).

Received July 30, 2007; revised March 14, 2008; accepted March 21, 2008


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Deaf Stud Deaf EducHome page
C. M. Convertino, M. Marschark, P. Sapere, T. Sarchet, and M. Zupan
Predicting Academic Success Among Deaf College Students
J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ., July 1, 2009; 14(3): 324 - 343.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.