Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mayer, C
Right arrow Articles by Akamatsu, C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mayer, C
Right arrow Articles by Akamatsu, C
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, Vol 4, 1-8, Copyright © 1999 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

Bilingual-bicultural models of literacy education for deaf students: considering the claims

C Mayer and C Akamatsu
Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Canada; Toronto Board of Education, Canada; Corresponding author at: 95 Ferrier Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M4K 3116. E-mail: cmayer@oise.utoronto.ca

As Carolyn Ewoldt (1996) points out '[M]uch has been written of late about the viability of a bilingual focus in deaf education.' While these writings are necessary to the ongoing pedagogical dialogue in the field, much of the rhetoric suffers because, rather than truly adopting a 'holistic perspective', arguments and positions focus only on selected aspects of the relevant theoretical and research information. If proponents of bilingual education for deaf children truly rely on 'research on the benefits of native sign language and from theoretical and research support coming from other disciplines' (Ewoldt, 1996, p. 5) to support their claims, then these research and theoretical supports must be examined as comprehensively, and holistically, as possible. Weaving together only a few threads of theory and research does not create the fabric for a pedagogical position that can withstand close scrutiny and analysis.In this article, we will touch on some of the major claims made in explications of bilingual models of literacy education for deaf students (Baker, 1997; Livingston, 1997; Mashie, 1995; Mason & Ewoldt, 1996). Our goal is to broaden the scope of the discussion on some of the major arguments and to encourage an expanded dialogue in this ongoing debate. It is not our aim to argue against the concept of bilingual education for deaf students nor to advocate the exclusion of native sign languages from the classroom. Rather, we support the concept of a bilingual education for deaf students with native sign languages playing a key role; however, we contend that the model as it is currently conceived requires further scrutiny and analysis.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Deaf Stud Deaf EducHome page
D. Hermans, H. Knoors, E. Ormel, and L. Verhoeven
The Relationship Between the Reading and Signing Skills of Deaf Children in Bilingual Education Programs
J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ., April 8, 2008; (2008) enn009v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Deaf Stud Deaf EducHome page
D. Hermans, H. Knoors, E. Ormel, and L. Verhoeven
Modeling Reading Vocabulary Learning in Deaf Children in Bilingual Education Programs
J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ., April 1, 2008; 13(2): 155 - 174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Deaf Stud Deaf EducHome page
S. Freire
Creating Inclusive Learning Environments: Difficulties and Opportunities Within the New Political Ethos
J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ., October 27, 2007; (2007) enm055v1.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.