Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nunes, T.
Right arrow Articles by Moreno, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nunes, T.
Right arrow Articles by Moreno, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 7:2 2002
© 2002 Oxford University Press


Empirical Article

An Intervention Program for Promoting Deaf Pupils’ Achievement in Mathematics

Terezinha Nunes

Oxford Brookes University

Constanza Moreno

Royal Holloway, University of London

Our past research identified two aspects of deaf children's functioning that places them at risk for underachievement in mathematics. The first is their reduced opportunities for incidental learning, and the second is their difficulty in making inferences involving time sequences. This article examines the effectiveness of an intervention program to promote deaf children's numeracy that was designed to deal with these two factors. The design involved a comparison of 23 deaf pupils participating in the project with a baseline group formed by 65 deaf pupils attending the same schools in the previous year. The project pupils were tested before and after the intervention on the NFER-Nelson Age Appropriate Mathematics Achievement Test. The intervention was delivered by the teachers during the time normally scheduled for mathematics lessons. The project pupils did not differ from the baseline group at pretest but performed significantly better at posttest. They also performed at posttest better than expected on the basis of their pretest scores, according to norms provided by the NFER-Nelson Age Appropriate Mathematics Test for assessing the progress of hearing pupils. We conclude that the program was effective in promoting deaf pupils’ achievement in numeracy.

We thank The Nuffield Foundation for the support received through grant number HQ/313[EDU] without which this work would not have been possible. We also thank the schools, teachers, and children who enthusiastically participated in this project.

Correspondence should be sent to Terezhina Nunes, Department of Psychology, Oxford Brookes University, Gipsy Lane, Oxford OX3 0BP, United Kingdom (e-mail: tnunes{at}brookes.ac.uk).

Received September 26, 2000; revised June 18, 2001; accepted July 5, 2001


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Deaf Stud Deaf EducHome page
G. Blatto-Vallee, R. R. Kelly, M. G. Gaustad, J. Porter, and J. Fonzi
Visual Spatial Representation in Mathematical Problem Solving by Deaf and Hearing Students
J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ., October 1, 2007; 12(4): 432 - 448.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Deaf Stud Deaf EducHome page
R. Bull, G. Blatto-Vallee, and M. Fabich
Subitizing, Magnitude Representation, and Magnitude Retrieval in Deaf and Hearing Adults
J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ., July 1, 2006; 11(3): 289 - 302.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Deaf Stud Deaf EducHome page
N. Masataka
Differences in Arithmetic Subtraction of Nonsymbolic Numerosities by Deaf and Hearing Adults
J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ., April 1, 2006; 11(2): 139 - 143.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.