Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aldersley, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aldersley, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 7:3 2002
© 2002 Oxford University Press


Theory/Review Articles

Least Restrictive Environment and the Courts

Stephen Aldersley

National Technical Institute for the Deaf, Rochester Institute of Technology

This article provides a description and an analysis of how the U.S. federal courts have interpreted the least restrictive environment (LRE) clause in the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) since passage of the act by Congress in 1975. It begins with a brief highlighting of critical events in the evolution of the LRE concept in the political environment, particularly the impact of the clause on the educational placement of deaf children. The central roles within the IDEA of due process and parental involvement in educational decision making are then described. The article then charts the early (i.e., during the eighties and early nineties) evolution of judicial interpretation of LRE, before moving on to a review of cases involving the educational placement of deaf children where LRE has been a central issue. The first set of cases reviewed was all decided at the federal appeals court level, the second set at federal district court level. The article concludes with a comment regarding the prospects for a more balanced approach to educational placement for deaf youngsters.

In addition to serving as chair of the English Department at the National Technical Institute for the Deaf in Rochester, New York, the author is an Impartial Hearing Officer for the State of New York and has adjudicated some 30 special education hearings brought under the provisions of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, the controlling special education law of the United States of America. Correspondence should be sent to Stephen Aldersley, English Department, National Technical Institute for the Deaf, Rochester Institute of Technology, 1 Lomb Memorial Drive, Rochester, NY 14623 (e-mail: SFANCE{at}rit.edu).

Received August 21, 2001; revised September 18, 2001; accepted September 19, 2001


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Aural Rehabilitation and Its InstrumentationHome page
J. A. Luckhurst
Professional Preparedness for Provision of Auditory Oral Programs to Children With Hearing Loss: Results of a Survey
Aural Rehabilitation and Its Instrumentation, April 1, 2008; 15(1): 18 - 28.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am Educ Res JHome page
M. Marschark, J. B Pelz, C. Convertino, P. Sapere, M. E. Arndt, and R. Seewagen
Classroom Interpreting and Visual Information Processing in Mainstream Education for Deaf Students: Live or Memorex?
American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 2005; 42(4): 727 - 761.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.