Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 7:4 2002
© 2002 Oxford University Press
Empirical Articles |
Communication Mode and the Processing of Printed Words: Evidence From Readers With Prelingually Acquired Deafness
University of Haifa
The aim of this study was to elucidate how the primary communication background of prelingual deafened readers affects the way they mediate the recognition of written words. A computer-controlled research paradigm (a semantic decision task) asking for the categorization of familiar Hebrew nouns was used to investigate the participants' sensibility to phonological and orthographic manipulations in the target stimuli. Two groups of readers with hearing impairments and a hearing control group participated in the study. Twenty-seven of the participants with deafness (mean grade 6.9) were raised by hearing parents advocating a strict oral approach at home and at school. For an additional 22 students who were deaf (mean grade 6.9), the majority of them children of deaf parents, Israeli Sign Language was the preferred means of communication. The mean grade of the 39 participants in the hearing control group was 6.5. Findings indicate that both the hearing participants and the participants with prelingual deafness who were trained to communicate orally recoded visually presented target words phonologically. No such evidence was found for participants with deafness who were native signers. Although participants from signing backgrounds seemed to generate nonphonological representations of written words, there was no evidence that for them, the absence of recoding to phonology detrimentally affected on their ability to process such representations flexibly. In all, findings suggest a causal link between an individual's processing strategy for some written words and the modal nature of his or her primary language.
I thank David Share for his constructive comments on this manuscript. Correspondence should be sent to Paul Miller, Amnon ve Tamar, 20 36060 Kiriat Tivon, Israel (e-mail: mpaul{at}construct.haifa.ac.il).
Received April 20, 2001; revised November 15, 2001; accepted January 4, 2002
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  P. Miller The Nature and Efficiency of the Word Reading Strategies of Orally Raised Deaf Students J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ., July 1, 2009; 14(3): 344 - 361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Mayer What Really Matters in the Early Literacy Development of Deaf Children J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ., October 1, 2007; 12(4): 411 - 431. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Miller The Role of Spoken and Sign Languages in the Retention of Written Words by Prelingually Deafened Native Signers J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ., April 1, 2007; 12(2): 184 - 208. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Harris and C. Moreno Speech Reading and Learning to Read: A Comparison of 8-Year-Old Profoundly Deaf Children With Good and Poor Reading Ability J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ., April 1, 2006; 11(2): 189 - 201. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Miller What the Processing of Real Words and Pseudohomophones Can Tell Us about the Development of Orthographic Knowledge in Prelingually Deafened Individuals J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ., January 1, 2006; 11(1): 21 - 38. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|