Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Pagliaro, C. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Pagliaro, C. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 8:2 2003
© 2003 Oxford University Press


Empirical Article

Mathematics Word Problem Solving for Deaf Students: A Survey of Practices in Grades 6-12

Ronald R. Kelly and Harry G. Lang

National Technical Institute for the Deaf, Rochester Institute of Technology

Claudia M. Pagliaro

University of Pittsburgh

One hundred and thirty-three mathematics teachers of deaf students from grades 6-12 responded to a survey on mathematics word problem-solving practices. Half the respondents were teachers from center schools and the other half from mainstream programs. The latter group represented both integrated and self-contained classes. The findings clearly show that regardless of instructional setting, deaf students are not being sufficiently engaged in cognitively challenging word problem situations. Overall, teachers were found to focus more on practice exercises than on true problem-solving situations. They also emphasize problem features, possibly related to concerns about language and reading skills of their students, rather than analytical and thinking strategies. Consistent with these emphases, teachers gave more instructional attention to concrete visualizing strategies than to analytical strategies. Based on the results of this study, it appears that in two of the three types of educational settings, the majority of instructors teaching mathematics and word problem solving to deaf students lack adequate preparation and certification in mathematics to teach these skills. The responses of the certified mathematics teachers support the notion that preparation and certification in mathematics makes a difference in the kinds of word problem-solving challenges provided to deaf students.

Correspondence should be sent to Ronald R. Kelly, Department of Research, Center for Research, Teaching, & Learning, National Technical Institute for the Deaf, Rochester Institute of Technology, 96 Lomb Memorial Drive, Rochester, NY 14623-5604 (e-mail: rrkncp{at}rit.edu

Received November 3, 2001; revised February 12, 2002; accepted March 7, 2001


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Deaf Stud Deaf EducHome page
M. D. Remine, E. Care, and P. M. Brown
Language Ability and Verbal and Nonverbal Executive Functioning in Deaf Students Communicating in Spoken English
J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ., October 1, 2008; 13(4): 531 - 545.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Deaf Stud Deaf EducHome page
H. Lang and C. Pagliaro
Factors Predicting Recall of Mathematics Terms by Deaf Students: Implications for Teaching
J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ., October 1, 2007; 12(4): 449 - 460.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Deaf Stud Deaf EducHome page
R. R. Kelly and M. G. Gaustad
Deaf College Students' Mathematical Skills Relative to Morphological Knowledge, Reading Level, and Language Proficiency
J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ., January 1, 2007; 12(1): 25 - 37.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Deaf Stud Deaf EducHome page
E. Ansell and C. M. Pagliaro
The Relative Difficulty of Signed Arithmetic Story Problems for Primary Level Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Students
J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ., April 1, 2006; 11(2): 153 - 170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.