Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harris, M.
Right arrow Articles by Moreno, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Harris, M.
Right arrow Articles by Moreno, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 9:3 2004
© 2004 Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education vol. 9 no. 3 © Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved.

Deaf Children's Use of Phonological Coding: Evidence from Reading, Spelling, and Working Memory

Margaret Harris and Constanza Moreno

Royal Holloway, University of London

Two groups of deaf children, aged 8 and 14 years, were presented with a number of tasks designed to assess their reliance on phonological coding. Their performance was compared with that of hearing children of the same chronological age (CA) and reading age (RA). Performance on the first task, short-term recall of pictures, showed that the deaf children's spans were comparable to those of RA controls but lower than CA controls. For the older deaf children, short-term memory span predicted reading ability. There was no clear evidence that the deaf children were using phonological coding in short-term memory when recall of dissimilar items was compared with recall of items with similarly sounding names. In the second task, which assessed orthographic awareness, performance of the deaf children was similar to that of RA controls although scores predicted reading level for the deaf children but not the hearing. The final task was a picture spelling test in which there were marked differences between the deaf and hearing children, most notably in the number of spelling refusals (which was higher for the deaf children in the older group than their RA controls) and the percentage of phonetic errors (which was considerably lower for both groups of deaf children than for any of the hearing controls). Overall these results provide support for the view that deaf children place little reliance on phonological coding.

All correspondence should be sent to Margaret Harris, Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham Hill, Surrey TW20 0EX (e-mail: m.harris{at}rhul.ac.uk).


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Deaf Stud Deaf EducHome page
S. R. Easterbrooks and S. G. Huston
The Signed Reading Fluency of Students Who Are Deaf/Hard of Hearing
J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ., January 1, 2008; 13(1): 37 - 54.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Deaf Stud Deaf EducHome page
P. Miller
The Role of Spoken and Sign Languages in the Retention of Written Words by Prelingually Deafened Native Signers
J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ., April 1, 2007; 12(2): 184 - 208.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Deaf Stud Deaf EducHome page
F. E. Kyle and M. Harris
Concurrent Correlates and Predictors of Reading and Spelling Achievement in Deaf and Hearing School Children
J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ., July 1, 2006; 11(3): 273 - 288.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Deaf Stud Deaf EducHome page
M. Harris and C. Moreno
Speech Reading and Learning to Read: A Comparison of 8-Year-Old Profoundly Deaf Children With Good and Poor Reading Ability
J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ., April 1, 2006; 11(2): 189 - 201.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Deaf Stud Deaf EducHome page
P. Miller
What the Processing of Real Words and Pseudohomophones Can Tell Us about the Development of Orthographic Knowledge in Prelingually Deafened Individuals
J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ., January 1, 2006; 11(1): 21 - 38.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.