Skip Navigation



Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education Advance Access published online on July 23, 2009

The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, doi:10.1093/deafed/enp017
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Myers, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Fernandes, J. K.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Myers, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Fernandes, J. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Deaf Studies: A Critique of the Predominant U.S. Theoretical Direction

Shirley Shultz Myers

Gallaudet University

Jane K. Fernandes

University of North Carolina Asheville


   Abstract

The focus and concerns establishing Deaf Studies in the 1970s have rigidified into a reactive stance toward changing historical conditions and the variety of deaf lives today. This critique analyzes the theoretical foundation of this stance: a tendency to downplay established research in the field of Deaf Studies and linguistics, the employment of outdated examples of discrimination, an uncritical acceptance of Derrida's phonocentrism, flawed uses of Saussure's linguistic theory, and reliance on the limiting metaphor of colonialism. The purpose of the critique ultimately is to point Deaf Studies in a new direction. Issues with conceptualizing an expanded Deaf Studies are the focus of a companion article (this issue), "Inclusive Deaf Studies: Barriers and Pathways."

Correspondence should be sent to Shirley Shultz Myers, Ph.D., Gallaudet University, 800 Florida Ave. NE, Washington, DC 20002 (e-mail:shirley.shultz.myers{at}gallaudet.edu).

Received November 13, 2008; revised April 27, 2009; accepted June 11, 2009


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.