Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mayer, C.
Right arrow Articles by Wells, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mayer, C.
Right arrow Articles by Wells, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 1:2 1996
© 1996 Oxford University Press

Can the Linguistic Interdependence Theory Support A Bilingual-Bicultural Model of Literacy Education for Deaf Students?

Connie Mayer1, and Gordon Wells2

1Metropolitan Toronto School for the Deaf
2Ontario Institute for Studies in Education

Drawing on Cummins' (1989) linguistic interdependence model, proponents of bilingual-bicultural models of literacy education for deaf students claim that, if ASL is well established as the L1, then literacy in English (L2) can be achieved by means of reading and writing without exposure to English through either speech or English-based sign. In our opinion, this claim is based on a false analogy: the situation of the deaf learner of English literacy does not match the conditions assumed by the linguistic interdependence model. We draw on the work of Vygotsky and Halliday to develop a conceptualization of the processes involved in becoming literate, examining the particular and unique challenges that deaf students face as they strive to become members of the linguistic community of users of written English. We argue that becoming literate involves mastering three modes of language use: "social speech," "inner speech," and written text. In some respects the educational context for deaf students is analogous to that of other bilingual learners; in some crucial aspects, it is very different.

Correspondence should be sent to Connie Mayer, 95 Ferrier Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M4K 3H6, Canada (e-mail: cmayer{at}oise.on.ca).


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Deaf Stud Deaf EducHome page
D. Hermans, H. Knoors, E. Ormel, and L. Verhoeven
The Relationship Between the Reading and Signing Skills of Deaf Children in Bilingual Education Programs
J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ., April 8, 2008; (2008) enn009v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Deaf Stud Deaf EducHome page
D. Hermans, H. Knoors, E. Ormel, and L. Verhoeven
Modeling Reading Vocabulary Learning in Deaf Children in Bilingual Education Programs
J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ., April 1, 2008; 13(2): 155 - 174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Deaf Stud Deaf EducHome page
C. Mayer
What Really Matters in the Early Literacy Development of Deaf Children
J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ., October 1, 2007; 12(4): 411 - 431.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Deaf Stud Deaf EducHome page
H. Knoors
Educational Responses to Varying Objectives of Parents of Deaf Children: A Dutch Perspective
J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ., April 1, 2007; 12(2): 243 - 253.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Deaf Stud Deaf EducHome page
T. S. Haptonstall-Nykaza and B. Schick
The Transition From Fingerspelling to English Print: Facilitating English Decoding
J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ., April 1, 2007; 12(2): 172 - 183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian Journal of School PsychologyHome page
C. T. Akamatsu and E. Cole
Meeting the Psychoeducational Needs of Deaf Immigrant and Refugee Children
Canadian Journal of School Psychology, June 1, 2000; 15(2): 1 - 18.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.