Skip Navigation


Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education Advance Access originally published online on May 2, 2007
The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 2007 12(3):350-361; doi:10.1093/deafed/enm012
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
12/3/350    most recent
enm012v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Most, T.
Right arrow Articles by Peled, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Most, T.
Right arrow Articles by Peled, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cochlear Implants
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Perception of Suprasegmental Features of Speech by Children With Cochlear Implants and Children With Hearing Aids

Tova Most and Miriam Peled

Tel-Aviv University, Israel


  Abstract

This study assessed perception of suprasegmental features of speech by 30 prelingual children with sensorineural hearing loss. Ten children had cochlear implants (CIs), and 20 children wore hearing aids (HA): 10 with severe hearing loss and 10 with profound hearing loss. Perception of intonation, syllable stress, word emphasis, and word pattern was assessed. Results revealed that the two HA groups significantly outperformed the CI group in perceiving both intonation and stress. Within each group, word pattern was perceived best, and then intonation and emphasis, with syllable stress perceived poorest. No significant correlation emerged between age at implantation and perception of the various suprasegmental features, possibly due to participants' relatively late age at implantation. Results indicated that CI use did not show an advantage over HA use in the perception of suprasegmental features of speech. Future research should continue to explore variables that might improve this perception.

Correspondence should be addressed to Tova Most, School of Education, Tel Aviv University, Israel 69978 (e-mail: tovam{at}post.tau.ac.il).

Received October 26, 2006; revised March 1, 2007; accepted March 7, 2007


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Deaf Stud Deaf EducHome page
T. Most and C. Aviner
Auditory, Visual, and Auditory-Visual Perception of Emotions by Individuals With Cochlear Implants, Hearing Aids, and Normal Hearing
J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ., October 1, 2009; 14(4): 449 - 464.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Deaf Stud Deaf EducHome page
R. L. Whitehead, D. E. Metz, E. Girardi, J. Irwin, A. Krigsman, C. Swanson, D. MacKenzie, and N. Schiavetti
Suprasegmental Characteristics of Speech Produced during Simultaneous Communication by Inexperienced Signers
J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ., July 1, 2009; 14(3): 362 - 370.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Communication Disorders QuarterlyHome page
S. R. Easterbrooks
Knowledge and Skills for Teachers of Individuals Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing: Initial Set Revalidation
Communication Disorders Quarterly, November 1, 2008; 30(1): 12 - 36.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J Deaf Stud Deaf EducHome page
T. Most, I. Levin, and M. Sarsour
The Effect of Modern Standard Arabic Orthography on Speech Production by Arab Children With Hearing Loss
J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ., July 1, 2008; 13(3): 417 - 431.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.