Skip Navigation


Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education Advance Access originally published online on November 27, 2007
The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 2008 13(2):241-256; doi:10.1093/deafed/enm058
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
13/2/241    most recent
enm058v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Farjardo, I.
Right arrow Articles by Altoé, G.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Farjardo, I.
Right arrow Articles by Altoé, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Hyperlink Format, Categorization Abilities and Memory Span as Contributors to Deaf Users Hypertext Access

Inmaculada Farjardo

University of Manchester

Barbara Arfé

University of Verona

Patrizia Benedetti and Gianmarco Altoé

University of Padova


   Abstract

Sixty deaf and hearing students were asked to search for goods in a Hypertext Supermarket with either graphical or textual links of high typicality, frequency, and familiarity. Additionally, they performed a picture and word categorization task and two working memory span tasks (spatial and verbal). Results showed that deaf students were faster in graphical than in verbal hypertext when the number of visited pages per search trial was blocked. Regardless of stimuli format, accuracy differences between groups did not appear, although deaf students were slower than hearing students in both Web search and categorization tasks (graphical or verbal). No relation between the two tasks was found. Correlation analyses showed that deaf students with higher spatial span were faster in graphical Web search, but no correlations emerged between verbal span and verbal Web search. A hypothesis of different strategies used by the two groups for searching information in hypertext is formulated. It is suggested that deaf users use a visual-matching strategy more than a semantic approach to make navigation decisions.

The authors wish to express their gratitude to the deaf and hearing students from the Istituto Magarotto di Padova who contributed to this study by spending their time with us. We also want to thank Dr Ladislao Salmerón for his help in the development of the experimental tools. No conflicts of interest were reported. Correspondence should be sent to Inmaculada Farjardo, Manchester Business School, Booth Street West, Manchester M15 6PB, UK (e-mail: ifajardo{at}manchester.ac.uk).

Received January 17, 2007; revised October 5, 2007; accepted October 15, 2007


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.