Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fabbretti, D.
Right arrow Articles by Pontecorvo, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fabbretti, D.
Right arrow Articles by Pontecorvo, C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 3:3 1998
© 1998 Oxford University Press

Written Language Abilities in Deaf Italians

Daniela Fabbretti, Virginia Volterra and Clotilde Pontecorvo

Universita degli Studi di Roma "La Sapienza"
Istituto di Psicologia del C.N.R.
Universita degli Studi di Roma "La Sapienza"

Written texts produced by 10 Italian deaf native signers in four different writing tasks were analyzed. Data analysis focused on linguistic and orthographic nonstandard forms. The written production of deaf subjects with deaf parents (DD) was compared to the written production in two control groups: a group of 10 hearing subjects with deaf parents (HD) and a group of 10 subjects who have had no contact with deaf people or sign language (HH). The results duplicate findings from previous studies. Deaf subjects display a pattern of selective difficulty with Italian grammatical morphology, especially with free-standing function words. The four different writing tasks used in the present study yield results indicating that text type does influence our assessment of deaf writing abilities. A comparison of the texts written by deaf native signers with those of two hearing groups confirms the view that difficulties in the acquisition of written Italian are best explained by deafness itself, not by the influence of a previously acquired Sign Language, and that the specific difficulties with grammatical morphology displayed by our deaf subjects cannot be attributed solely to their limited experience with written Italian.

Correspondence should be sent to Virginia Volterra, Instituto di Psicologia del C.N.R., Reparto di Neuropsicologia del Linguaggio e Sordità, Via Nomentana 56, 00161, Roma.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Deaf Stud Deaf EducHome page
I. Farjardo, B. Arfe, P. Benedetti, and G. Altoe
Hyperlink Format, Categorization Abilities and Memory Span as Contributors to Deaf Users Hypertext Access
J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ., April 1, 2008; 13(2): 241 - 256.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Deaf Stud Deaf EducHome page
D. Hermans, H. Knoors, E. Ormel, and L. Verhoeven
Modeling Reading Vocabulary Learning in Deaf Children in Bilingual Education Programs
J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ., April 1, 2008; 13(2): 155 - 174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.