Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sutcliffe, A
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sutcliffe, A
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, R
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, Vol 4, 111-123, Copyright © 1999 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

Deaf children's spelling: does it show sensitivity to phonology?

A Sutcliffe, A Dowker and R Campbell
Balliol College, Oxford, UK; University College London, UK; Corresponding author at: Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3UD, UK

A written pictures to spelling task was given to two groups of children, 17 deaf children from signing schools (average age = 10.7) and 20 hearing children learning English as a second language (ESL, average age = 10.4). The stimuli were equally divided according to frequency, phonological regularity, and orthographic regularity. We predicted that the deaf group would not differ from the ESL group in the pattern of their responses across word classes, categorized in terms of the effect of frequency and phonological and orthographic regularity. Results showed that broadly this was the case, but more detailed analysis showed that the approach of the two groups was different. More specifically, the deaf children appeared to be sensitive to, but not aware of, phonology in their spelling, whereas the ESL group showed awareness of, as well as sensitivity to, phonology in their spelling.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Deaf Stud Deaf EducHome page
P. Miller
The Nature and Efficiency of the Word Reading Strategies of Orally Raised Deaf Students
J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ., July 1, 2009; 14(3): 344 - 361.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Deaf Stud Deaf EducHome page
F. E. Kyle and M. Harris
Concurrent Correlates and Predictors of Reading and Spelling Achievement in Deaf and Hearing School Children
J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ., July 1, 2006; 11(3): 273 - 288.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Deaf Stud Deaf EducHome page
M. Harris and C. Moreno
Speech Reading and Learning to Read: A Comparison of 8-Year-Old Profoundly Deaf Children With Good and Poor Reading Ability
J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ., April 1, 2006; 11(2): 189 - 201.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Deaf Stud Deaf EducHome page
P. Miller
What the Processing of Real Words and Pseudohomophones Can Tell Us about the Development of Orthographic Knowledge in Prelingually Deafened Individuals
J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ., January 1, 2006; 11(1): 21 - 38.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHHome page
B. R. Schirmer and S. M. McGough
Teaching Reading to Children Who Are Deaf: Do the Conclusions of the National Reading Panel Apply?
Review of Educational Research, January 1, 2005; 75(1): 83 - 117.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.