Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education Advance Access published online on August 3, 2006
The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, doi:10.1093/deafed/enl009
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 National Technical Institute for the Deaf, Rochester Institute of Technology
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Focus-on-form English teaching methods are designed to facilitate second-language learners' noticing of target language input, where "noticing" is an acquisitional prerequisite for the comprehension, processing, and eventual integration of new grammatical knowledge. While primarily designed for teaching hearing second-language learners, many focus-on-form methods lend themselves to visual presentation. This article reports the results of classroom research on the visually based implementation of focus-on-form methods with deaf college students learning English. Two of 3 groups of deaf students received focus-on-form instruction during a 10-week remedial grammar course; a third control group received grammatical instruction that did not involve focus-on-form methods. The 2 experimental groups exhibited significantly greater improvement in English grammatical knowledge relative to the control group. These results validate the efficacy of visually based focus-on-form English instruction for deaf students of English and set the stage for the continual search for innovative and effective English teaching methodologies.
Received March 27, 2006
Revised July 6, 2006
Accepted July 9, 2006
Article
Focus-on-Form Instructional Methods Promote Deaf College Students' Improvement in English Grammar
Gerald P. Berent 1 *, Ronald R. Kelly 1, Stephen Aldersley 1, Kathryn L. Schmitz 1, Baldev Kaur Khalsa 1, John Panara 1, and Susan Keenan 1
Gerald P. Berent, E-mail: gerald.berent{at}rit.edu
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S.-F. Cheng and S. Rose Investigating the Technical Adequacy of Curriculum-Based Measurement in Written Expression for Students Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ., October 1, 2009; 14(4): 503 - 515. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. P. Berent, R. R. Kelly, K. L. Schmitz, and P. Kenney Visual Input Enhancement via Essay Coding Results in Deaf Learners' Long-Term Retention of Improved English Grammatical Knowledge J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ., April 1, 2009; 14(2): 190 - 204. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Han, E. S. Park, and C. Combs Textual Enhancement of Input: Issues and Possibilities Applied Linguistics, December 1, 2008; 29(4): 597 - 618. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

