<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org">
<title>Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education - Advance Access</title>
<link>http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org</link>
<description>Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education - RSS feed of articles</description>
<prism:eIssn>1465-7325</prism:eIssn>
<prism:publicationName>Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>1081-4159</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enn016v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enn014v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enn015v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enn013v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enn012v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enn011v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enn008v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enn010v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enn009v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enn004v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enn003v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enn005v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enn007v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enn006v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enm066v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enn002v2?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enn001v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enm069v2?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enm068v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enm067v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enm065v2?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enm064v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enm063v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enm062v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enm059v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enm060v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enm055v1?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enn016v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Striving for Beyond either/or]]></title>
<link>http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enn016v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Porter, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-08</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/deafed/enn016</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Striving for Beyond either/or]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Book Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enn014v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Learning via Direct and Mediated Instruction by Deaf Students]]></title>
<link>http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enn014v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Four experiments investigated classroom learning by deaf college students receiving lectures from instructors signing for themselves or using interpreters. Deaf students' prior content knowledge, scores on postlecture assessments of content learning, and gain scores were compared to those of hearing classmates. Consistent with prior research, deaf students, on average, came into and left the classroom with less content knowledge than hearing peers, and use of simultaneous communication (sign and speech together) and American Sign Language (ASL) apparently were equally effective for deaf students' learning of the material. Students' self-rated sign language skills were not significantly related to performance. Two new findings were of particular importance. First, direct and mediated instruction (via interpreting) were equally effective for deaf college students under the several conditions employed here. Second, despite coming into the classroom with the disadvantage of having less content knowledge, deaf students' gain scores generally did not differ from those of their hearing peers. Possible explanations for these findings are considered.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marschark, M., Sapere, P., Convertino, C., Pelz, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/deafed/enn014</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Learning via Direct and Mediated Instruction by Deaf Students]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Empirical Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enn015v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Deaf History Reader]]></title>
<link>http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enn015v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Abbate, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-23</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/deafed/enn015</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Deaf History Reader]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Book Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enn013v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evaluating Phonological Processing Skills in Children With Prelingual Deafness Who Use Cochlear Implants]]></title>
<link>http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enn013v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This study investigated the phonological processing skills of 29 children with prelingual, profound hearing loss with 4 years of cochlear implant experience. Results were group matched with regard to word-reading ability and mother&rsquo;s educational level with the performance of 29 hearing children.</p>
<p>Results revealed that it is possible to obtain a valid measure of phonological processing (PP) skills in children using CIs. They could complete rhyming tasks and were able to complete sound-based tasks using standard test materials provided by a commercial test distributor. The CI children completed tasks measuring PP, but there were performance differences between the CI users and the hearing children. The process of learning phonological awareness (PA) for the children with CIs was characterized by a longer, more protracted learning phase than their counterparts with hearing. Tests of phonological memory skills indicated that when the tasks were controlled for presentation method and response modality, there were no differences between the performance of children with CIs and their counterparts with hearing. Tests of rapid naming revealed that there were no differences between rapid letter and number naming between the two groups. Results yielded a possible PP test battery for children with CI experience.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Spencer, L. J., Tomblin, J. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/deafed/enn013</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evaluating Phonological Processing Skills in Children With Prelingual Deafness Who Use Cochlear Implants]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Empirical Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enn012v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Social Construction of American Sign Language--English Interpreters]]></title>
<link>http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enn012v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Instructors in 5 American Sign Language&mdash;English Interpreter Programs and 4 Deaf Studies Programs in Canada were interviewed and asked to discuss their experiences as educators. Within a qualitative research paradigm, their comments were grouped into a number of categories tied to the social construction of American Sign Language&mdash;English interpreters, such as learners' age and education and the characteristics of good citizens within the Deaf community. According to the participants, younger students were adept at language acquisition, whereas older learners more readily understood the purpose of lessons. Children of deaf adults were seen as more culturally aware. The participants' beliefs echoed the theories of <cross-ref type="bib" refid="bib21">P. Freire (1970/1970)</cross-ref> that educators consider the reality of each student and their praxis and were responsible for facilitating student self-awareness. Important characteristics in the social construction of students included independence, an appropriate attitude, an understanding of Deaf culture, ethical behavior, community involvement, and a willingness to pursue lifelong learning.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McDermid, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/deafed/enn012</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Social Construction of American Sign Language--English Interpreters]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Empirical Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enn011v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Literacy Skills in Children With Cochlear Implants: The Importance of Early Oral Language and Joint Storybook Reading]]></title>
<link>http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enn011v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The goal of this study was to longitudinally examine relationships between early factors (child and mother) that may influence children's phonological awareness and reading skills 3 years later in a group of young children with cochlear implants (<I>N</I> = 16). Mothers and children were videotaped during two storybook interactions, and children's oral language skills were assessed using the "Reynell Developmental Language Scales, third edition." Three years later, phonological awareness, reading skills, and language skills were assessed using the "Phonological Awareness Test," the "Woodcock&ndash;Johnson-III Diagnostic Reading Battery," and the "Oral Written Language Scales." Variables included in the data analyses were child (age, age at implant, and language skills) and mother factors (facilitative language techniques) and children's phonological awareness and reading standard scores. Results indicate that children's early expressive oral language skills and mothers&rsquo; use of a higher level facilitative language technique (open-ended question) during storybook reading, although related, each contributed uniquely to children's literacy skills. Individual analyses revealed that the children with expressive standard scores below 70 at Time 1 also performed below average (&lt;85) on phonological awareness and total reading tasks 3 years later. Guidelines for professionals are provided to support literacy skills in young children with cochlear implants.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[DesJardin, J. L., Ambrose, S. E., Eisenberg, L. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-15</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/deafed/enn011</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Literacy Skills in Children With Cochlear Implants: The Importance of Early Oral Language and Joint Storybook Reading]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Empirical Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enn008v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Seeing the Deaf in "Deafness"]]></title>
<link>http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enn008v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This article draws on some of the existing literature on the politics of identity and representation as related to minority group formation. It applies this to constructions of Deaf<cross-ref type="fn" refid="fn2">2</cross-ref> identity from a cultural and linguistic perspective and contrasts this with dominant constructions of Deaf people as disabled. It highlights a number of ways in which Deaf identity differs from disabled identity, demonstrating that the cultural and linguistic construction of Deaf people is a more useful tool for analysis. It raises questions aimed to examine the discourse on deafness and seeks further debate on how best the discourse can be progressed. The article raises issues related to the use of terminology and labeling in the field of deafness. It contends that the continued use of the word deafness is unworkable and should be more widely recognized as a social construct, which has current usage beyond the paradigm in which it was originally intended. The article concludes by recognizing the importance of diversity in identity formation, while simultaneously calling for an appreciation of the need to incorporate this diversity within wider theorizing, focused on commonality and cohesion in identity as a source of collective expression and political mobilization.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Obasi, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-15</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/deafed/enn008</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Seeing the Deaf in "Deafness"]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Theory/Review</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enn010v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Language Ability and Verbal and Nonverbal Executive Functioning in Deaf Students Communicating in Spoken English]]></title>
<link>http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enn010v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The internal use of language during problem solving is considered to play a key role in executive functioning. This role provides a means for self-reflection and self-questioning during the formation of rules and plans and a capacity to control and monitor behavior during problem-solving activity. Given that increasingly sophisticated language is required for effective executive functioning as an individual matures, it is likely that students with poor language abilities will have difficulties performing complex problem-solving tasks. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between language ability and verbal and nonverbal executive functioning in a group of deaf students who communicate using spoken English, as measured by their performance on two standardized tests of executive function: the Delis&ndash;Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) 20 Questions Test and the D-KEFS Tower Test. Expressive language ability accounted for more than 40% of variability in performance on the D-KEFS 20 Questions Test. There was no significant relationship between language ability and performance on the D-KEFS Tower Test. There was no relationship between language ability and familiarity with the specific problem-solving strategies of both D-KEFS Tests. Implications of the findings are discussed.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Remine, M. D., Care, E., Brown, P. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-08</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/deafed/enn010</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Language Ability and Verbal and Nonverbal Executive Functioning in Deaf Students Communicating in Spoken English]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Empirical Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enn009v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Relationship Between the Reading and Signing Skills of Deaf Children in Bilingual Education Programs]]></title>
<link>http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enn009v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This paper reports on one experiment in which we investigated the relationship between reading and signing skills. We administered a vocabulary task and a story comprehension task in Sign Language of the Netherlands and in written Dutch to a group of 87 deaf children from bilingual education programs. We found a strong and positive correlation between the scores obtained in the sign vocabulary task and the reading vocabulary task when age, short-term memory scores, and nonverbal intelligence scores were controlled for. In addition, a correlation was observed between the scores in the story comprehension tasks in Sign Language of the Netherlands and written Dutch but only when vocabulary scores for words and signs were not taken into account. The results are briefly discussed with reference to a model we recently proposed to describe lexical development for deaf children in bilingual education programs (Hermans, D., Knoors, H., Ormel, E., &amp; Verhoeven, L., 2008). In addition, the implications of the results of the present study for previous studies on the relationship between reading and signing skills are discussed.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hermans, D., Knoors, H., Ormel, E., Verhoeven, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-08</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/deafed/enn009</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Relationship Between the Reading and Signing Skills of Deaf Children in Bilingual Education Programs]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Empirical Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enn004v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Deafness and Challenging Behavior: The 360{degrees} Perspective]]></title>
<link>http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enn004v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ouellette, S. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-08</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/deafed/enn004</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Deafness and Challenging Behavior: The 360{degrees} Perspective]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Book Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enn003v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Parameters in Television Captioning for Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Adults: Effects of Caption Rate Versus Text Reduction on Comprehension]]></title>
<link>http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enn003v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Caption rate and text reduction are factors that appear to affect the comprehension of captions by people who are deaf or hard of hearing. These 2 factors are confounded in everyday captioning; rate (in words per minute) is slowed by text reduction. In this study, caption rate and text reduction were manipulated independently in 2 experiments to assess any differential effects and possible benefits for comprehension by deaf and hard-of-hearing adults. Volunteers for the study included adults with a range of reading levels, self-reported hearing status, and different communication and language preferences. Results indicate that caption rate (at 130, 180, 230 words per minute) and text reduction (at 84%, 92%, and 100% original text) have different effects for different adult users, depending on hearing status, age, and reading level. In particular, reading level emerges as a dominant factor: more proficient readers show better comprehension than poor readers and are better able to benefit from caption rate and, to some extent, text reduction modifications.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Burnham, D., Leigh, G., Noble, W., Jones, C., Tyler, M., Grebennikov, L., Varley, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-27</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/deafed/enn003</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Parameters in Television Captioning for Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Adults: Effects of Caption Rate Versus Text Reduction on Comprehension]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enn005v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Explicit Processing Demands Reveal Language Modality-Specific Organization of Working Memory]]></title>
<link>http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enn005v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The working memory model for Ease of Language Understanding (ELU) predicts that processing differences between language modalities emerge when cognitive demands are explicit. This prediction was tested in three working memory experiments with participants who were Deaf Signers (DS), Hearing Signers (HS), or Hearing Nonsigners (HN). Easily nameable pictures were used as stimuli to avoid confounds relating to sensory modality. Performance was largely similar for DS, HS, and HN, suggesting that previously identified intermodal differences may be due to differences in retention of sensory information. When explicit processing demands were high, differences emerged between DS and HN, suggesting that although working memory storage in both groups is sensitive to temporal organization, retrieval is not sensitive to temporal organization in DS. A general effect of semantic similarity was also found. These findings are discussed in relation to the ELU model.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rudner, M., Ronnberg, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/deafed/enn005</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Explicit Processing Demands Reveal Language Modality-Specific Organization of Working Memory]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enn007v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Family Mediation of Mathematically Based Concepts While Engaged in a Problem-Solving Activity With Their Young Deaf Children]]></title>
<link>http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enn007v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This qualitative study examined the relationship between young deaf children's level of mathematics ability ("high" and "low," as defined by test score on the Test of Early Mathematics Ability-3) and opportunities available for the construction of early mathematics knowledge during a problem-solving task implemented by their parents. Findings indicate that the manner in which the mathematically based concepts (number/counting, quantity, time/sequence, and categorization) were incorporated into the activity was more meaningful for children who demonstrated high levels of mathematical ability. In addition, children who demonstrated high levels of mathematical ability experienced a more purposeful use of mediation during activity implementation; however, overall use of mediated learning experience was limited for children from both ability groups.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kritzer, K. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-15</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/deafed/enn007</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Family Mediation of Mathematically Based Concepts While Engaged in a Problem-Solving Activity With Their Young Deaf Children]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Empirical Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enn006v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Academic Status of Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Students in Public Schools: Student, Home, and Service Facilitators and Detractors]]></title>
<link>http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enn006v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We examined facilitators and detractors of academic success of 25 deaf or hard-of-hearing (DHH) students selected from a pool of 187 students attending general education classes and enrolled in a study of academic progress. Interviews with their teachers of DHH, general education teachers, principals, parents, interpreters, and students themselves were analyzed for child, family, and school facilitators and detractors of academic status. Facilitators included student self-advocacy and motivation, high family and school expectations, families&rsquo; ability to help with homework, and good communication between professionals. Detractors included additional disabilities and poor family&ndash;school communication. A comparison of above- and below-average students revealed no single distinguishing facilitator or detractor. Each above-average student had many facilitators, whereas each below-average student had several significant detractors.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reed, S., Antia, S. D., Kreimeyer, K. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-15</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/deafed/enn006</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Academic Status of Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Students in Public Schools: Student, Home, and Service Facilitators and Detractors]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Empirical Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enm066v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Dark Times for Peoples of the Eye?]]></title>
<link>http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enm066v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee De Filippo, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/deafed/enm066</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Dark Times for Peoples of the Eye?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Book Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enn002v2?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[With Enthusiasm--All Things Great]]></title>
<link>http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enn002v2?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Conley, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-02-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/deafed/enn002</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[With Enthusiasm--All Things Great]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-02-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Book Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enn001v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Exploring the Potential of Constructionist Therapy: Deaf Clients, Hearing Therapists and a Reflecting Team]]></title>
<link>http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enn001v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This article explores the use of constructionist therapy with a reflecting team of hearing therapists seeing deaf clients. Using findings from two in-depth interviews, postsession reflections and a review of the literature, we propose that this model has the potential to cater to the diversity of the lived experiences of deaf people and also to address issues of power and tensions between medical, social, and cultural models of deafness. The interviews found there was real value in sharing multiple perspectives between the reflecting team of hearing therapists and these deaf clients. In addition, the clients reported feeling safe and comfortable with this model of counseling. Other information that emerged from the interviews supports previous findings regarding consistency in interpreting and the importance of hearing therapists having an understanding of the distinctions between Deaf and hearing worlds. As the first investigation of its kind in Australia, this article provides a map for therapists to incorporate reflecting teams with interpreters, deaf clients, and hearing therapists. The value of this article also lies in providing a much needed platform for future research into counseling outcomes and the efficacy of this constructionist model of therapy.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Munro, L., Knox, M., Lowe, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-02-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/deafed/enn001</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Exploring the Potential of Constructionist Therapy: Deaf Clients, Hearing Therapists and a Reflecting Team]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-02-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enm069v2?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A Treat for the Eyes]]></title>
<link>http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enm069v2?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gustina, D. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-02-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/deafed/enm069</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A Treat for the Eyes]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-02-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Book Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enm068v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Characteristics of Youths With Hearing Loss Admitted to Substance Abuse Treatment]]></title>
<link>http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enm068v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The purpose of this study is to provide a profile of youths with hearing loss admitted to substance abuse treatment facilities. Intake data on 4,167 youths (28% female; 3% reporting a hearing loss) collected via the Global Appraisal of Individual Need-I assessment was used for the analyses. Information on demographics, environmental characteristics, substance use behaviors, and symptoms of co-occurring psychological problems for youths with and without a hearing loss was analyzed via Pearson chi-square tests and effect sizes. The groups reported similar backgrounds and comparable rates of marijuana and alcohol use. However, youths in the hearing loss group reported substance use behaviors indicative of a more severe level of involvement. Across all measures of co-occurring symptoms, youths with hearing loss reported greater levels of distress and were more often victims of abuse. Results of this study will help inform treatment needs of youths with hearing loss and define a baseline for future research.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Titus, J. C., Schiller, J. A., Guthmann, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-02-04</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/deafed/enm068</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Characteristics of Youths With Hearing Loss Admitted to Substance Abuse Treatment]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-02-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enm067v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Executive Function and Language in Deaf Children]]></title>
<link>http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enm067v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The relationship between language and executive function (EF) and their development in children have been the focus of recent debate and are of theoretical and clinical importance. Exploration of these functions in children with a peripheral hearing loss has the potential to be informative from both perspectives. This study compared the EF and language skills of 8- to 12-year-old children with cochlear implants (<I>n</I> = 22) and nonimplanted deaf children (<I>n</I> = 25) with those of age-matched hearing controls (<I>n</I> = 22). Implanted and nonimplanted deaf children performed below the level of hearing children on tests assessing oral receptive language, as well as on a number of EF tests, but no significant differences emerged between the implanted and nonimplanted deaf groups. Language ability was significantly positively associated with EF in both hearing and deaf children. Possible interpretations of these findings are suggested and the theoretical and clinical implications considered.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Figueras, B., Edwards, L., Langdon, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-02-04</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/deafed/enm067</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Executive Function and Language in Deaf Children]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-02-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enm065v2?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Role Salience and Anticipated Work-Family Relations Among Young Adults With and Without Hearing Loss]]></title>
<link>http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enm065v2?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This study examined the effect of hearing status on role salience and anticipated work&ndash;family relations among 101 unmarried young adults aged 20&ndash;33 years: 35 with hearing loss (19 hard of hearing and 16 deaf) and 66 hearing. Participants completed the Life Role Salience scale, anticipated conflictual relations scale, anticipated facilitory relations scale, and a background questionnaire. The deaf participants demonstrated a significantly higher level of commitment to work but anticipated the significantly lowest level of conflict. Hearing status was a significant variable in predicting anticipated conflictual relations among all participants. Mode of communication was a significant predictor of conflictual relations among the hearing loss group. Implications for theory and practice were discussed.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cinamon, R. G., Most, T., Michael, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-01-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/deafed/enm065</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Role Salience and Anticipated Work-Family Relations Among Young Adults With and Without Hearing Loss]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-01-31</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enm064v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phonological Awareness and Decoding in Deaf/Hard-of-Hearing Students Who Use Visual Phonics]]></title>
<link>http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enm064v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Visual phonics, a system of 45 hand and symbol cues that represent the phonemes of spoken English, has been used as a tool in literacy instruction with deaf/hard-of-hearing (DHH) students for over 20 years. Despite years of anecdotal support, there is relatively little published evidence of its impact on reading achievement. This study was designed to examine the relationship between performance on a phonological awareness task, performance on a decoding task, reading ability, and length of time in literacy instruction with visual phonics for 10 DHH kindergarten through Grade 3 students receiving academic instruction with sign-supported English and American Sign Language. Findings indicate that these students were able to use phonological information to make rhyme judgments and to decode; however, no relationship between performance on reading ability and length of time in literacy instruction with visual phonics was found.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Narr, R. F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-01-21</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/deafed/enm064</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Phonological Awareness and Decoding in Deaf/Hard-of-Hearing Students Who Use Visual Phonics]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-01-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Empirical Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enm063v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Sign Language Comprehension: The Case of Spanish Sign Language]]></title>
<link>http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enm063v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This study aims to answer the question, how much of Spanish Sign Language interpreting deaf individuals really understand. Study sampling included 36 deaf people (deafness ranging from severe to profound; variety depending on the age at which they learned sign language) and 36 hearing people who had good knowledge of sign language (most were interpreters). Sign language comprehension was assessed using passages of secondary level. After being exposed to the passages, the participants had to tell what they had understood about them, answer a set of related questions, and offer a title for the passage. Sign language comprehension by deaf participants was quite acceptable but not as good as that by hearing signers who, unlike deaf participants, were not only late learners of sign language as a second language but had also learned it through formal training.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rodriguez Ortiz, I. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-13</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/deafed/enm063</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Sign Language Comprehension: The Case of Spanish Sign Language]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-12-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Empirical Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enm062v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Self-Rated Mental Health, School Adjustment, and Substance Use in Hard-of-Hearing Adolescents]]></title>
<link>http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enm062v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This survey, "Life and Health&mdash;Young People 2005," included all 15/16-year-old adolescents in mainstream schools in the county of &Ouml;rebro, Sweden. Just students with a slight/mild or moderate hearing loss were included. There were 56 (1.9%) "hard-of-hearing (HH) students with multiple disabilities," 93 (3.1%) students who were "just HH," 282 (9.7%) students with some "other disability than HH," and 2,488 (85.2%) students with "no disability." "HH with multiple disabilities" reported considerably higher scores for mental symptoms, substance use, and school problems than the "no disability" group. Those with "just HH" and those with "other disability than HH" had more mental symptoms and school problems than the "no disability" group but no significant differences in substance use. In conclusion, the combination of a hearing loss and some other disability strongly increases the risk for mental symptoms, school problems, and substance use. This group, thus, is an important target for preventive measures.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brunnberg, E., Bostrom, M. L., Berglund, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-13</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/deafed/enm062</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Self-Rated Mental Health, School Adjustment, and Substance Use in Hard-of-Hearing Adolescents]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-12-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Empirical Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enm059v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Toward Extending the Educational Interpreter Performance Assessment to Cued Speech]]></title>
<link>http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enm059v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The Educational Interpreter Performance Assessment (EIPA) is as an important research tool for examining the quality of interpreters who use American Sign Language or a sign system in classroom settings, but it is not currently applicable to educational interpreters who use Cued Speech (CS). In order to determine the feasibility of extending the EIPA to include CS, a pilot EIPA test was developed and administered to 24 educational CS interpreters. Fifteen of the interpreters&rsquo; performances were evaluated two to three times in order to assess reliability. Results show that the instrument has good construct validity and test&ndash;retest reliability. Although more interrater reliability data are needed, intrarater reliability was quite high (0.9), suggesting that the pilot test can be rated as reliably as signing versions of the EIPA. Notably, only 48% of interpreters who formally participated in pilot testing performed at a level that could be considered minimally acceptable. In light of similar performance levels previously reported for interpreters who sign (e.g., <cross-ref type="bib" refid="bib22">Schick, Williams, &amp; Kupermintz, 2006</cross-ref>), these results suggest that interpreting services for deaf and hard-of hearing students, regardless of the communication option used, are often inadequate and could seriously hinder access to the classroom environment.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Krause, J. C., Kegl, J. A., Schick, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-11-27</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/deafed/enm059</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Toward Extending the Educational Interpreter Performance Assessment to Cued Speech]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-11-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Empirical Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enm060v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Effect of Modern Standard Arabic Orthography on Speech Production by Arab Children With Hearing Loss]]></title>
<link>http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enm060v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This article examined the effect of Modern Standard Arabic orthography on speech production quality (syllable stress and vowels) by 23 Arabic-speaking children with severe or profound hearing loss aged 8&ndash;12 years. Children produced 15 one-syllable minimal pairs of words that differed in vowel length (short vs. long) and 20 two-syllable minimal pairs differing in stress pattern. Each word was produced in three tasks: reading partially or fully vowelized words and imitation of aural stimuli. Results showed that fully vowelized words ensured vowel production: high-quality productions appeared on 99%, 74%, and 59% of productions on reading fully vowelized words, partially vowelized words, and on imitation, respectively. Moreover, correct vowel production affected correct consonant production. Correct production of stress was best on reading fully vowelized words, appearing on 54%, 21%, and 33% of productions for fully vowelized words, partially vowelized words, or imitation, respectively. Findings suggest the need to present fully vowelized written texts when teaching speech production to children with hearing loss. Such presentations enable more accurate productions that result in more intelligible speech.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Most, T., Levin, I., Sarsour, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-11-19</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/deafed/enm060</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Effect of Modern Standard Arabic Orthography on Speech Production by Arab Children With Hearing Loss]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-11-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Empirical Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enm055v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Creating Inclusive Learning Environments: Difficulties and Opportunities Within the New Political Ethos]]></title>
<link>http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/enm055v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Freire, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-10-27</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/deafed/enm055</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Creating Inclusive Learning Environments: Difficulties and Opportunities Within the New Political Ethos]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-10-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Endnotes</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>